this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
495 points (95.9% liked)

Political Weirdos

742 readers
666 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeurtisticAlgorithm9 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In real debates, you logically disprove the other person while proving your own point

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

In a real debate the judges actually keep score based on logical arguments and good examples, typically what’s called matter, manner, and method. This was political theater or maybe a skills test, but not a debate. And pretty much always was for as long as I can remember.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but i mean if you think about it someone is wrong then. Which means there wouldnt be a reason to debate because you can just compare the two claims and choose the true one. And if what they are debating is subjective then there is no winner.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

You convince the audience that your position is better and the path forward for whatever reasons. Doesn't have to be correct/incorrect.

You also win by appearing presidential.