this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
112 points (98.3% liked)

Bicycles

3125 readers
42 users here now

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The move is in response to many young electric bike riders who often take to the streets without having tested for or received a typical driver’s license for a standard car. That means they are often ignorant of many traffic laws and safety information.

Assembly Bill 530, which will soon enter committee, would require both an online written test and a state-issued identification for riders who do not have a driver’s license. The bill would also ban riders under 12 years old from riding e-bikes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's make runners get a license too... Studies have been done to show removing barriers for alternative transit increase participation. Stuff like this just lead to profiling from police, and less people riding. Maybe if someone can show me a study of these being a serious harm and not pearl clutching I might take this more seriously.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Certainly, here you go:

While reliable numbers are elusive, the pattern isn’t. According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), estimated emergency department visits due to micromobility products (e-bikes, e-scooters and hoverboards) more than doubled from 2017 to 2021. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), meanwhile, counted 53 deaths from e-bike accidents from that same period and it decried the “lack of complete, consistent and reliable data” that likely leads to vast underestimations of the actual statistics. The NTSB’s report noted that “fatalities associated with e-bike ridership have also increased exponentially.”

Data from other countries are concerning, too: in the Netherlands, e-bikes were responsible for 27% of all fatal bicycle accidents in 2017; in Israel, electric-powered bikes and scooters accounted for 3,686 hospital admissions between 2014 and 2019; and a Dutch study found that e-bike riders were 1.6 times more likely to wind up in the emergency department than riders of regular bikes.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So 53 deaths in the US? Pretty low. Especially compared to the 685k deaths caused by heart disease.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What in the world does heart disease have to do with this?

If we can save some of those people with the rather simple and easy step of licensure, shouldn’t we? Like what’s the downside when there are lives on the line?

Basically it’s the same argument as driver’s licenses. Are you opposed to requiring training and certification to operate a car?

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a barrier of entry. Studies have shown that this would result in less participation, that's the issue.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s okay though. I would prefer people use regular non-ebike bicycles anyway, which are safer and healthier alternatives for everyone. So kinda win/win.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I'd rather we do whatever we can to get people out of cars. And ebikes might be stepping stones to road bikes. Adding more barriers does nothing more then reenforce a car centric lifestyle.