this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
148 points (99.3% liked)

Canada

7187 readers
408 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But researchers say focusing on the environmental impacts and potential health harms of the finished products alone hides their actual environmental impact. Manufacturing Teflon and other fluoropolymers uses other, more dangerous PFAS chemicals. These compounds are known to contaminate the environment surrounding manufacturing facilities, said Rainer Lohmann, a professor of oceanography at the University of Rhode Island.

"Basically, anywhere where there's a major fluoropolymer producer, they seem to have succeeded in contaminating the entire region with their production process," he said.

The ministry's move to remove fluoropolymers from its proposed rules suggests those industry lobbying efforts have worked, MacDonald said. Using a study with self-declared ties to the chemical industry to back up the ministry's decision to exclude fluoropolymers "just kind of shows a little bit of what's happening behind the scenes in terms of where the government is taking the industry's word," she said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's hold them accountable by voting in the rabidly pro-business party. That'll show em!

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nah, I mean by having a general strike until the corrupt members of the liberal party get with the times and pass proportional representation without a referendum with the conservatives, smaller parties and independents. Lets have 95% represented instead of 40%.

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

It sure would be useful if Trudeau believed that passing proportional representation was the one thing he could do for a viable bid for re-election at this point