this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
223 points (96.3% liked)

World News

32304 readers
447 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spacebar@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Belarus better stay within its boarders, because that the only way Belarus will be attacked.

[–] takeda@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think after Poland ignored two Russian missiles, putin is thinking to use Wagner from Belarus to test and see what will happen if NATO country gets attacked. The normal answer would be that it would be war between Belarus and NATO. Which should be fairly quick. He is trying to tip the scale by saying Russia will be also back Belarus if attacked (BTW Hitler also stated WW2 claiming Poland attacked Nazi Germany), hoping that NATO won't back up Poland.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure Ukraine said those were their missiles.

[–] mihor@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed they were. Ukrainian S-300 missiles, they probably malfunctioned and went off in a random direction.

[–] Surface_Detail@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Thing is, every line Russia has drawn in the sand, accession to NATO, arms supplies to Ukraine etc have been proven to be empty words. Russia has backed off each time.

An attack on Poland from Belarus would quickly lead to an invasion from Poland. Securing Ukraine's northern border would free up a lot of Ukrainian resources and would put NATO soldiers in another neighboring country to Russia.

It would be suicide for Russia's invasion of Ukraine.