UK Politics

3103 readers

283 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom

GreatAlbatross

flamingos

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Tactical voting in byelections spells bad news for Tories (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Emperor to c/uk_politics

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Searching for positives in the aftermath of Thursday’s triple byelections, the Conservative party chair, Greg Hands, pointed out that Labour had lost its deposit in Somerton and Frome. Speaking immediately after, the polling expert Sir John Curtice had a different view: this was actually bad news for the Tories.

...

As noted by Curtice, the results once again show how much better UK voters are getting at making tactical decisions, although this is generally seen as easier to do in a byelection, without the wider political noise of a general election.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Annoyingly, this approach benefits the conservatives because of fptp, assuming you're planning on voting for a left-leaning independent.

Labour and conservative may be basically the same, but that's because they're both effectively centrist parties. One of them sits slightly to the right of the center whilst the other sits slightly to the left.

Because of fptp, it's always going to be one of these two parties in power without some huge upheaval for both parties at the same time, which is unlikely to happen.

Protest votes to the left are seen as a win for the Tories because that's one less vote for labour, protest votes to the right are seen as a win for labour as it's one less vote for the Tories.

Our voting system is just crap.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yes, we should absolutely change the voting system. But I don't believe in tactical voting.

I'm not going to vote for one of the main two parties just because they're the main two parties. I don't care if that's classed as a "wasted vote", our voting system is not my problem.

[–] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Except it is yours, and all our problem isn't it?