this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
133 points (99.3% liked)
Technology
37716 readers
350 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've been using this for a bit and have some major complaints, the primary one being that reviews and books aren't shared across all servers. I'm still going to use it to track my reading, but the "social" aspect is straight limited from the start. I want to see ALL reviews for a book, not just the people I follow or the ones on the server I joined. How do you even find people to follow with that level of visibility?
This thread talks through it. https://fosstodon.org/@Brendanjones/110722850962870241
Edit: It's still way better than feeding your data into the maw of the ever-hungry Amazon, but I want it to be something I can recommend to my non-technical reading folks.
I kind of see the idea. When I check some of the higher quality (to me that means evidence backed with an internally coherent logic to new ideas) nonfiction on goodreads/other platforms, especially early, too many reviews boil down to "reading is hard".
But it should definitely give you a way to expand to "all reviews", because I can't see many single servers having enough of a base to be useful on their own.
True. Popular books being read by millions of people have no reviews. That's why I'm on the LibraryThing now.