this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
374 points (99.0% liked)

196

16449 readers
2061 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
374
Rachael rule (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (12 children)
[โ€“] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 2 months ago (11 children)

According to Ridley Scott. P. K. Dick disagreed.

๐Ÿ˜

[โ€“] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I guess it depends on your reference yeah. In the movies he was a replicate

[โ€“] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's never explicitly stated in the movie. I believe it's hinted at just enough to make you wonder. Which in turn makes you wonder what even makes a human person. In the sequel I think they pretty heavily lean on him being human.

[โ€“] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Both the director and actor have confirmed it though

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)