this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
2586 points (95.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

29819 readers
1330 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

i’m doing it because I want to make the fediverse more friendly place, in hopes of making it more welcoming for new users, and the nicer place in general. But I wonder how much is just less bots.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dsemy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry I misread your comment, I thought you said leftists lack disagreement, while also claiming it’s a good thing. I don’t think leftism is small and unified (that’s why I put it in quotes in my comment, since I assumed you actually meant a small subsection of leftists).

Also, while I honestly despise Musk, if he truly believes that (I doubt it), then I agree with him.

I probably define fascism the same as you, no need to be passive aggressive.

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah ok.

Re Musk, it's about intent. He's been using "different opinions" under the pretence of "free speech" (and "democracy") as an excuse to boost fascist content on Twitter. It's cryptofash doublespeak.

But even fascism aside "you should be more open to debating differing opinions" still comes across as tone-deaf centrism.

In any case the implications aren't pretty.

As for defining fascism, with crap like "horseshoe theory" muddying the waters, as well as the general impression people have that fascism is some isolated evil from the past, there's ample room for doubt in online interactions.

[–] dsemy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let me make things clear - extreme opinions (like, in my personal opinion, supporting terrorism) shouldn’t be tolerated or accepted.

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure but statements like that are kinda meaningless when there are people who believe that movements like Antifa and BLM are "terrorist".

[–] dsemy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I guess you’re right.

I define a terrorist as someone who kills (or attempts to kill) innocent people publicly to incite terror due to ideological reasons (I’m not a native English speaker and this sentence was hard for me to write, hopefully this makes sense).

The vast, vast majority of BLM and Antifa aren’t even close to this definition, so while there are some things they do I disagree with, I will always defend their right to protest and resist.

[–] Historical_General@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no need to be passive aggressive.

Mate, you were confrontational in the first place lol, no need to tell the other guy to calm down, he's not an idiot, he knows what you initially assumed of him obviously.

[–] dsemy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I didn’t mean to be confrontational, but rereading my comment I could see why you would say that. I’d chalk it up to cultural differences.

But this means he could have also not meant to be passive aggressive, so I also shouldn’t have assumed.