this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
302 points (96.9% liked)

okmatewanker

645 readers
3 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
302
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Emperor to c/okmatewanker
 

Perhaps you could bugger off back to your gentlemen's club now and never darken the doorstep of a boozer again.

Context:

And sundry other tomfoolery.

Broader context (on here):

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Then why is the hate directed at the addicts and not the companies who produce the product or the governments who allow these companies to flourish?

[–] grozzle@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

strawman argument.

tobacco companies and governments are widely hated.

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You know banning smoking would never work. Just look at how ubiquitous weed and cocaine use is. Also if smoking only affected the person smoking then it would be fine, but second hand smoke is a health issue and it just fucking stinks.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee -3 points 2 months ago

Smoking can be reduced without banning smoking. Unfortunately, mitigation methods like vaping are treated the same as smoking, because fuck poor people trying to quit. Additionally, massively taxing the producers would put them out of business, and there would be less of a black market because there really isn't a "high" from nicotine and the crop isn't really practible on the small scale.