this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
1163 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

10420 readers
3243 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/19504984

It's all relative

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How fast would the rose have to be going to blueshift that much? Someone please do the math

[โ€“] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For a shift from about 700nm to 350nm: coming right at you at 0.6c

It would also have a kinetic energy of about 1.1234 Petajoules, on the order of magnitude of the Tsar Bomba

[โ€“] BB84@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Kinetic energy or total energy? Assuming the rose weight 10 grams I get that 1.12PJ total energy, but only 0.23PJ is kinetic.

[โ€“] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In hindsight I was a bit generous with the weight, I assumed 50g

[โ€“] BB84@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Only 10MT instead of 50 then?

[โ€“] BB84@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One ton of TNT is 1E9 calories which is 4 gigajoules. So 0.2 petajoules should be only 50 kilotons of TNT?

A fart in the wind next to the Tsar Bomba. My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.

[โ€“] vrek@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't know about blue but here is all the math to turn a red light green.... Don't think of doing it though while you could probably get out of a ticket for running a red light I don't even know what the fine is for driving many thousand times the speed limit is.

Edit: just realized I forgot to post the actual link.... https://sciencenotes.org/fast-go-make-red-light-look-green-relativistic-doppler-effect/#:~:text=If%20we%20take%20the%20speed%20of%20light%20to,to%20convert%20to%20km%2Fhr%2C%20you%20get%20197%2C640%2C000%20km%2Fhr.

[โ€“] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

To bad the traffic light is in the speed radar's reference frame, when your licence plate is on the photo I doubt the judge will care that your yellow car is clearly blue in the photo

[โ€“] vrek@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Actually I think that would then add a additional charge for registration fraud

[โ€“] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Impossibly fast and it would have to be coming right at us.

[โ€“] FleetingTit@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

60% of lightspeed, according to another commenter.