this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
1329 points (99.8% liked)

196

16449 readers
2226 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

==please incorporate the word rule in your post titles==
Here are the things that get you banned:
-saying anything remotely iffy with a lemmygrad or hexbear account
-tankie behaviour
-nazi behaviour
-authoritarian behaviour
-genocide denial
-prejudice of any kind
-anything else that is clearly bad

Things that get your post/comment removed:
-AI generated content
-anything in the banlist
-posts that are so off topic that they don't fit on 196 at all
-moldy memes (old memes, crusty memes, irrelevant memes. The type of things you'd see on your aunt's Facebook page or Elon musk's Twitter account with a laughing emoji as the caption)
-corpoposting

Ban length varies, and is mostly based off of whether or not I think you will change your behavior. I have baned certain people for upwards of 2000 days.

---------EDIT:NSFW RULES---------
NSFW Content is now fully permitted BUT it must be tagged. Any NSFW content that has not been tagged and blurred will be removed. Content warnings should also be added to the title in brackets. Example: [penis] or: [explicit description of sex].
Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged. Yes, even female breasts.

IRL GORE IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER ANY CONDITION.

8-----------------------------------------------------------
Please leave any suggested edits in the comments.

JAN 2024 UPDATE: MOLDY MONDAYS
Monday is now moldy Monday. on this day and only this day moldy memes are not only allowed, but encouraged. The crustier the better. The type of thing that's been reposted at least 2,000 times with filters and bad crops and watermarks and hopefully minions. please caption with moldy rule

If you have any issues, please reach us at 196mods@protonmail.com. PLEASE do not dm me, as I am not consistently available and tend to step away from the mantle for weeks to months at a time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darcy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why are they even allowed to federate here

[–] curiosityLynx@beehaw.org 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The main dev of lemmy is one of them, that's how.

[–] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this instance isn't associated with the devs

[–] darkwing_duck@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Other than being hosted at the same ip as lemmy.ml

[–] katve@lemmy.blahaj.zone 66 points 1 year ago

This instance is blahaj.zone, hosted by the folks at blahaj.zone?

Blahaj.zone isn't run by the Devs of Lemmy, they could easily block both Lemmygrad and lemmy.ml if they wanted. They just choose not to for some reason.

[–] animelivesmatter@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

I mean, it says in the post, they're allowd to federate but are "on probation"

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably because banning people based purely on political ideology is kind of facist 😝

[–] lasandra@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Reminds me exactly on the wise words of Sir Karl Popper about the 'paradox of tolerance':

"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force;"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[–] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems like a scarecrow argument to me.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Not very based.

[–] joborun@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's Popper's and Milt.Friedman's way of laundering fascism as a legitimate ideology, a useful tool for capitalist domination and anti-communism.

[–] Pazuzu@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you expand on what you were saying here? Are you saying the paradox of tolerance is itself promoting fascist ideology? Can you please explain?

[–] joborun@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Being against humans can't possibly be a human ideology, so fascists don''t count under this protectionist umbrella, I hope.

[–] joborun@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

why does this comment dance between ultra-naive to ultra-troll in my mind?