Futurology

1774 readers

129 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

voidx@futurology.today

Lugh@futurology.today

Espiritdescali@futurology.today

AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today

The invisible problem with sending people to Mars - Getting to Mars will be easy. It’s the whole ‘living there’ part that we haven’t figured out. (www.theverge.com)

submitted 2 months ago by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The only real estate upside to Mars is a tenuous wisp of atmosphere. Other than that, the Moon is superior in every way.

I'd consider a Moon colony, a floating Venus colony, a Titan colony or a space station. You couldn't pay me enough to go anywhere else, since there's nothing there to spend it on anyway.

Edit: Or interstellar stuff, I guess.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Liquid water under Mars' surface could be a huge upside if we can confirm it's there and figure out how to get to it

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

The moon has water too, and melting it is NBD, so they're actually equal there for real estate purposes.

For scientific purposes liquid water is interesting, but it's much easier to send a robot than all the various amenities needed for human scientists, and probably always will be.