this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
62 points (91.9% liked)

UK Politics

3107 readers
376 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So Israel break international law and then Starmer asks Iran to just suck it up, saying it will put the ceasefire in jeopardy, ignoring the fact that Israel just assassinated the lead negotiator. What in the bloody fuck?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm sorry, how else would you like us to interpret

I'm struggling to understand what you think he should have said.

Followed by

Since you agree with the UK government that it's best to settle this through the international systems of diplomacy and justice, would it be fair to say you also agree that Iran shouldn't respond by attacking Israel?

Especially in light of the links above where Starmer clearly isn't impartial.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Big ole assumption on your part here. You don't have to cover every side of a situation when you discuss a specific facet.

Their second quote could certainly be followed by a sentence reflecting on Israel's massive issues, without losing the consistency of narrative.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago

I would like you to interpet it at face value. It does not say that I support Israel committing war crimes.