Privacy

32159 readers

1762 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

588

Signal has been blocked by Venezuela and Russia (www.theverge.com)

submitted 3 months ago by gytrash to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

187 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Signal is being blocked in Venezuela and Russia. The app is a popular choice for encrypted messaging and people trying to avoid government censorship, and the blocks appear to be part of a crackdown on internal dissent in both countries..."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

IPv6 doesn't need CGNAT. So as long as it's capable of doing IPv6, it can directly communicate peer to peer using globally unique addresses. How do I know this? Simple because my ISP on IPv4 is completely CGNAT and I cannot get anything past it. So I am completely forced to use IPv6 for any service I want to run and access from outside my network.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but ipv6 is not widely adopted. I'm behind a CG-NAT but can't get an ipv6 so I have to operate a vps bridge to host my services. Some cell networks have ipv6 support but a few implement a NAT for it as well. AT&T only allows port 80 and 443.

Its not consistent enough to be useful without a centralized relay.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think that really depends on where you are. Here in the US, for example, IPv6 is pretty darn well adopted. And even 45% of Google's internet traffic is done over IPv6.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure but if your looking to use a chat service, 45% is not a high enough watermark to have reliability. Its so contingent on the network operator to allow for an IPV6 connection. And like I said, places like AT&T have a NAT on their IPV6 network.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

True, the only other option is something like simplex through tor. There are also p2p options like meshtastic as well.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Non ipv6 parts of the internet are considered derelict at at this point.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

And... That doesn't change the fact it's not widely adopted enough for peer2peer chat services without the need of a relay.