this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
829 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59308 readers
4851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Spotify is already making people pay for sound quality that's akin to a TDK C90

[–] bloopinator@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Audiophiles out here in denial of the fact that 99% of music is played via Bluetooth.

I don’t care if my streamed music isn’t the absolute best quality when I’m listening on AirPods or in my car.

[–] Proweruser@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

What does Bluetooth have to do with it? First there are lossless Bluetooth codecs and even if you don't use one of them, good source material still helps. Imagine a jpeg that was resaved multiple times to get an idea how artifacts stack.

Spotify's codec should in theory even be good enough to not be distinguishable from CD quality, but somehow some songs just sound like shit anyway. I suspect it's a problem with how they were digitised.

I'm using the free version of tidal instead. In the beginning I had a problem with some things not being on there, but that has mostly been resolved.

I'm also just using Sennheiser momentum true wireless 3. No fancy audiophile equipment.

[–] Proweruser@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

What does Bluetooth have to do with it? First there are lossless Bluetooth codecs and even if you don't use one of them, good source material still helps. Imagine a jpeg that was resaved multiple times to get an idea how artifacts stack.

Spotify's codec should in theory even be good enough to not be distinguishable from CD quality, but somehow some songs just sound like shit anyway. I suspect it's a problem with how they were digitised.

I'm using the free version of tidal instead. In the beginning I had a problem with some things not being on there, but that has mostly been resolved.

I'm also just using Sennheiser momentum true wireless 3. No fancy audiophile equipment.

[–] Venomnik0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Then just use Apple Music. Has the same roster of tracks but with better quality overall for free.