Programming

17511 readers

77 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

1507

Real examples here? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 3 months ago by megaman@discuss.tchncs.de to c/programming@programming.dev

282 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Friend who is not a software person sent me this tweet, which amused me as it did them. They asked if "runk" was real, which I assume not.

But what are some good examples of real ones like this? xz became famous for the hack of course, so i then read a bit about how important this compression algorithm is/was.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mke@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They said they're quite serious about it, actually. While it's quirky, I don't see anything wrong with it. It's... weirdly charming? I'd never use anything like it, but it's fun to see something different amidst a world of copy-pasted contributor covenants.

[–] 0xDREADBEEF@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, to make such a point that the only point of the page was simply to satisfy a requirement of someone else's volition and yet creating that page and apparently saying what you're saying—seems like there's something misaligning here :P

Also I no doubt that they hate people who talk too much and hate making jokes — there's some seriously unserious stuff inside of the rules they posted. They are serious folks who have zero tolerance for laughter apparently :D

My headcanon is they're a bunch of people who have a super religious supplier with strict checkbox rules and they are fucking with them.

[–] mke@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean, that could be the case, but for the record, they really seem like some seriously dedicated folks—a 1:590 ratio of code to tests! What is this, the Oracle test suite?—that is, dedicated in both in their work and their faith.

[...] according to the original author of SQLite and its main administrator, D. Richard Hipp, he received "100 per cent buy-in from all committers prior to publishing [the CoE]."

Hipp [...] defends the "Christian values" that the document represents and points out that SQLite source code has a "blessing" at the top of each file in place of a license and includes the Jesus-inspired phrase: "Find forgiveness for yourself while forgiving others."

"I could have edited the list down to just those aspects that seem relevant to coding," Hipp told us. "But that would put me in the position of editing and redacting Benedict of Nursia, as if I were wiser than he. [...] In the preface, I tried to make clear that the introspective aspects could be safely glossed over."

"Nobody is excluded from the SQLite community due to biological category or religious creed," he told us. "[...] The only way to get kicked out of the SQLite community is by shouting, flaming, and disrespectful behavior. In 18 years, only one person has ever been banned from the mailing list."

Source - The Register

I find it more likely that they're just religious. To each their own.