this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
154 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13533 readers
987 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean it. They haven't apologized for their war crimes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry we like dropped two atomic bombs on you while you were peacefully surrendering and we're remembered as the good guys.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It was justified. We had to kill all those civilians to threaten the USSR!

[–] nomorehalfmeasureswalter@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the USSR dropped the bomb it would have been justified

[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I know they picked civilians-only cities to drop the bombs cuz [white noise screeches], and their priority was for Japan to surrender to the US instead of to the URSS, which coincided with what Imperial Japan wanted. And I also know the nuclear bombings weren't immediately reported as anomaly cuz conventional bombing campaigns caused similar immediate results

That said,

I always wondered if they could have dropped the bomb in the sea in front of Tokio so the capital would see the fungus, feel the heat blast and the mild tsunami but without civilian casualties; and so scare them into immediate surrender without doing a massive war crime