Privacy

32130 readers

362 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

862

Google illegally maintains monopoly over internet search, judge rules (apnews.com)

submitted 3 months ago by gytrash to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

107 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"WASHINGTON (AP) — A judge on Monday ruled that Google’s ubiquitous search engine has been illegally exploiting its dominance to squash competition and stifle innovation in a seismic decision that could shake up the internet and hobble one of the world’s best-known companies..."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 64 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even if the punishment is largely symbolic and Google only pays a tiny (compared to it's massive size) fine; I'd still call that a significant win.

Google can be REQUIRED to give users A CHOICE of Search Engines.
Google can be FORBIDDEN from giving their OWN ENGINE an advantage in search results or advertising
Google can be FORCED to ALLOW THIRD PARTIES access to the SAME APIs used in Chrome and Chromium.
Google can be FORBIDDEN from BLOCKING THIRD PARTY FRONTENDS from using Google Search, Youtube and more.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Google can be REQUIRED to give users A CHOICE of Search Engines.

Don't they, err, already do this?

I mean a search engine is literally just a website and absolutely nothing prevents you from just going to duckduckgo.com or bing.com or wherever. Don't think Chrome prevents you from accessing other search engines in general, and last time I used it (admittedly a while back) it had a setting to change the search engine used by default if you just typed something into the address bar.

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don’t they, err, already do this?

No, They don't. They have stolen that initial choice from you by paying companies to be the "default" choice. They do this to capture those who are lazy or indolent about their choices, or to entrap those who are too un-savvy to change the preference.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You do know there's a big difference between a "default" option and a "mandatory" setting, right? Specifically that you do, in fact, have a choice to change a default?

Not forcing the user to proactively make a choice is not the same thing as denying the user the ability to choose.

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 1 points 3 months ago

Your argument is irrelevant.