this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
678 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3837 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Updates:

Might be best for mods to lock this post at this point (is that a thing on Lemmy?) because this story is basically wrapped. The FBI says a bullet caused some ear damage. Maybe it was bullet shrapnel from a ricochet or something like that, but later photos show the teleprompters in-tact so it wasn't shards of glass from those. Trump's usage of the bandage (and the assassination attempt) as symbols and political tools has been discussed at length and I don't think conspiratorial thinking beyond that is very productive. Pete Souza took his own account down after getting a lot of harassment, so no further conspiracies are needed regarding X-formerly-known-as-Twitter at this time.

A photo of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump taken on Saturday without his ear bandage has sparked a wave of speculation.

The image, taken by Alex Brandon of the Associated Press on July 27 and shared by photojournalist Pete Souza on X, formerly Twitter, shows Trump walking up an airplane staircase with an apparently fully healed ear wound just weeks after he was shot with a high-powered rifle.

Souza, known for his tenure as the chief official White House photographer for Presidents Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama, posted Brandon's photo on his now-deactivated X account on Saturday, writing, "AP photo this morning. Look closely at his ear that was 'hit' by a bullet from an AR-15 assault rifle."

Souza's profile, @PeteSouza, which had over 200,000 followers, now reads, "This account doesn't exist, try searching for another," implying that he has deleted or deactivated it. If he had been banned, it would read, "Account suspended. X suspends accounts which violate the X rules."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I still expect Trump's ear wound appearance was fixed with cosmetics, I mean why wouldn't they? He doesn't want to look like Frankenstein. I got downvoted to hell in another thread for posting that though.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Are you insane? There is no way Trump would pass up that sort of imagery.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

No, trump is vain and an attention seeker. Hed rather talk about the ear while looking perfect. (He also has a distorted self-image but that's another thing)

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He could have just kept wearing the bandage, if he wanted that.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was fully expecting the bandage to stay on for months.

But you can't expect anything from the guy, so...

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 months ago

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if he forgot he got shot.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

People started making fun of him for it. He is fragile enough that being called out for his sanitary pad ear would probably bother him.

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I do not agree. I think he see it a sign of weakness. He wants everything to look perfect, there are no way he want to look week.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Since when are scars a sign of weakness. They scream courage or bravery to me

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He literally made fun of a war prisoner because he got caught! We are talking a bout trump here.

[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 4 points 3 months ago

Fair enough...

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't they? Because they want to sell the strong tin leader narrative. I'm surprised he took the bandage off. I'm surprised he isn't wearing a T-shirt with his little PR photo tiny-handed fist in the air. I'm sure he asks his sycophants if it looked more manly than the photo of shirtless Putin riding a stallion.

[–] paf0@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

He's a real boy now.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 4 points 3 months ago

Because it will raise eyebrows

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That was my first thought too. Makeup to cover it up. I didn't know why you'd be DVed, except my Trump Cultists maybe. As if he's not always caked in bronzer as is. Guys can wear makeup - every actor in Hollywood does, at the very least.