Technology

59652 readers

5292 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

838

Linux Mint 22 released: An attractive option for migrating away from Windows | Windows 11 system requirements block millions of PCs from upgrading, while Linux Mint continues to work on older hardware (www.ghacks.net)

submitted 4 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

233 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Linux Mint team has just released Linux Mint 22, a new major version of the free Linux distribution. With Windows 10's end of support coming up quickly next year, at least some users may consider making the switch to Linux.

While there are other options, paying Microsoft for extended support or upgrading to Windows 11, these options are not available for all users or desirable.

Linux Mint 22 is a long-term service release. Means, it is supported until 2029. Unlike Microsoft, which made drastic changes to the system requirements of Windows 11 to lock out millions of devices from upgrading to the new version, Linux Mint will continue to work on older hardware, even after 2029.

Here are the core changes in Linux Mint 22:

Based on the new Ubuntu 24.04 package base.
Kernel version is 6.8.
Software Manager loads faster and has improved multi-threading.
Unverified Flatpaks are disabled by default.
Preinstalled Matrix Web App for using chat networks.
Improved language support removes any language not selected by the user after installation to save disk space.
Several under-the-hood changes that update libraries or software.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bobgray123987@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I researched this a few years ago, but is their a way to get SolidWorks, SpaceClaim etc working on Linux? Or do I have to run a virtual machine with windows?

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 12 points 4 months ago

Switching to Linux is almost always going to involve accepting that you may need to use alternative software compared to what you're used to. If that's unacceptable and you have mission critical work that can only be done on Windows compatible software, you may be better off staying put.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was not successful running Solidworks under Linux and it even detects when it is running in a virtual machine and refuses to install completely!

Finally I have found an alternative that suits my needs, that has free account for hobby purposes: on-shape.com it's web-based, works flawlessly under Linux and Firefox. Workflow is very similar to Solidworks, and version-control is simple and nice.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

Doesn't onshape originate from a bunch of SW engineers so that'd make sense!

Personally, I was paying for SW with a maker license but this year I've committed to Freecad, use realthunder's fork that has the topo naming fix + modern ui workbench for a more familiar layout.

I would call it totally useable, workflow for me ends up the same or similar to solidworks, I tried fusion because that's really popular but it didn't click with me while freecad did. I won't pretend it's flawless and doesn't have quirks but I'm willing to accept that for foss, need to spend a bit of time with it to get used to what it expects you to do but it's really powerful once you do.

[–] WhiteHairSuperSaiyan@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Some people have run solidworks on Linux with limited success. Granted I have never personally done it, from what I understand they used wine which emulates windows anyway. So it depends on how much time you are willing to sink to get things working.

[–] Adincar@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 months ago

Not to be critical of your input but wine is not an emulator (which is wine's acronym), it's actually a translation layer that converts windows calls into Linux on the fly, which can be a lot faster than emulating windows. Add to the original person's question a quick Google led me to this project