this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
1682 points (100.0% liked)

196

16484 readers
2026 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was about to agree with you but then I reread the statement you responded to and it's:

Yeah fascism really ended in 1945 /s

So your suggestion is to put it:

fascists really ended in 1945

Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not a native speaker but that's a weird phrasing. For me it implies (or rather implicates) that all fascists ended because to end is a very strong verb semantically when applied to humans. And honestly, I wouldn't use it at all.

[–] BornVolcano@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I meant in the original post haha. Since their comment was that fascism didn't end in 1945. If the post had said "winning against fascists", it would make more logical sense

[–] sweetviolentblush@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In internet slang the /s means they were making a sarcastic statement, so they were being sarcastic when they said "Yeah fascism really ended in 1945 /s".

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Yes I know. I was referring to the answer:

Replace the word with "fascists" and it makes so much more logical sense. And this is why wording matters

Which I interpreted as ... well you know. I'm not going to perpetuate this argument.