this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1252 points (95.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9682 readers
1754 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But the one on the left wouldn’t pass US fuel economy standards, which are based on vehicle footprint since 2012.

Bigger cars consume more fuel.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but the regulation is a "amount of fuel per weight of vehicle". In absolute terms it's more.

It's like when you're buying produce. $10 for 10 strawberries ($1.00 per berry) and $15 for 20 strawberries ($0.75 per berry). The $15 option is "only" $0.75 per berry, but it's also just more money in total.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's moronic to define fuel economy per pound of vehicle.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unintended consequences, the plague on governments through history.

[–] DaneGerous@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When a consequence is so blatantly predictable can it be unintended?

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can it truly be considered intended when Congress just signs the bills ALEC pays them to sign? I guess ALEC intends it.

[–] DaneGerous@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

If the purpose is to sell more expensive trucks and SUVs then the bill has been wildly successful.