China

2032 readers

65 users here now

Discuss anything related to China.

Community Rules:

0: Taiwan, Xizang (Tibet), Xinjiang, and Hong Kong are all part of China.

1: Don't go off topic.

2: Be Comradely.

3: Don't spread misinformation or bigotry.

讨论中国的地方。

社区规则：

零、台湾、西藏、新疆、和香港都是中国的一部分。

一、不要跑题。

二、友善对待同志。

三、不要传播谣言或偏执思想。

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml

Discussion of new Rule 4: Do not promote or put drugs/alcohol/tobacco/weed/psychedelics/inhalants in a positive light. (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by qwename@lemmygrad.ml to c/china@lemmygrad.ml

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Rule 4: Do not promote or put drugs/alcohol/tobacco/weed/psychedelics/inhalants in a positive light.

Some comrades mentioned in private channels that weed is not addictive, I'm not going to argue on this point because this is a fundamental divide between China and some western countries.

My view is that whether you're addicted to them or not, you shouldn't promote these substances or put them in a positive light. It's fine if you don't agree with me, but anyone who leaves a comment here arguing the opposite will be banned from the community (30 days for now).

If a lot of people oppose this rule, either by downvotes and/or number of comments, I will willingly step down as moderator of this community.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] D61@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

substance abuse

Is there anybody actually arguing that being addicted to something drug-wise is a good thing?

[–] qwename@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think anyone will do so, but they might instead talk about their experiences with such substances in a neutral or positive tone, they might describe the experience as "interesting" or "cool". While a person might not be intentionally promoting a substance when they talk about it in this way, what will people who are addicted to the substance think about such opinions? If there's no opposition raised, the substance might be viewed as any other normal item.

This is not a rule to ostracize people who are addicted to various substances, it's to clearly signal that these substances are not cool, not interesting, not something to joke about, not something to try out.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago

Maybe change the phrasing of Rule 4 to something that reflects that concern. "We don't discuss personal drug use out of consideration for comrades who might have substance abuse issues or bad experiences."