this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
345 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3155 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Kamala all the way! It won't be AOC or Whitmer though. Most likely Kelly or Newsom. AOC is the future, though.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Newsome cannot and will not be the VP. Harris is also from California, which would cause issues in the electoral college. Electors cannot cast both the Presidential and vice-presidential ballot for someone from the same state as themselves. Because both Harris and Newsome are form California, it could cause issues, and they might not get the electoral votes from California.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It's the first clause of the 12th Amendment to the United States Constitution, here's the relevant text:

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves

You can read the full text on Wikipedia or on the official website of Congress.

What this would mean in practice, is that if Gavin Newsome were chosen as Kamala Harris' running mate, is that many (if not the overwhelming majority) of Californian Presidential Electors would be prohibited from voting for Harris and Newsome, since the electors are generally chosen from local politicians and other locally influential individuals.

Harris needs every electoral vote she can get, and risking any of California's many votes would be a significant threat to her election.

I hope that satisfies your need for citations, and please, correct me if I've interpreted the law wrong here.

Edit: grammar, and added my separate other comment to the end of the above citation.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

so what debate one-liners are you putting on your bingo card?

[–] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Lock him up!" <-- If she doesn't fucking say this so help me god...

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

My bing card is “slaps cuffs on him during the debate.”

[–] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I doubt Newsome, you wouldn't want both from California

[–] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Very good point! Kelly then? That's my top pick.