this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
101 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

52 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 

Interesting bit of news for the threadiverse. All three of these are fairly large lemmy instances

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

This simply solidifies my opinion that I've had all along that Beehaw is a trash instance full of sensitive censor-happy ninnies and I hope they all resolve the issues they are having to eventually be finally free from trolls and assholes in their humble & beautiful walled-garden paradise echo chamber. All the best for them.

[–] bill_1992@kbin.social 61 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Isn't the whole point of the fediverse that you get to create and craft your experience for your community? There's a really good reason defederating is a feature. I don't get it, Beehaw decides to use the features of federation so now we: firstly become tribalistic (them vs us), and secondly decide to get angry? Like it or not, this is what you signed up for when you wanted federation.

I don't see the point of getting angry like this, and really don't see how this negativity being conducive to a thriving community. Some new people are going to explore fediverse, see tribalistic mudslinging among instances, and say "not for me."

I'd say respect their decision and move on, if it's not for you it's not for you.

[–] zalack@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they're saying "look, we only have four mods, have a highly targeted type of community we are trying to build, and have had to disproportionately moderate users from these instances" which seems reasonable on it's face.

That's kind of the beauty of Lemmy/Kbin right? You can spin up an instance with whatever rules you want. I think people are reacting to the fact that during the Reddit exodus Beehaw kind of looked like a "default" general instance, including me.

But that's a misreading on our part, not them going back on that.

[–] BreadDog@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Its both a value add and a negative. For those more focused on their own community (Like beehaw) it's an obvious positive. But for many users, losing access to certain communities on your own instance of choice is going to be a negative. I personally don't blame Beehaw for favoring the former. I think improved moderation tools and more granular federation would at least make the move less of a blow to users.

[–] SemioticStandard@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Absolutely. It’s disappointing that this person read a post made by the Beehaw admins that was written with nuance and grace, and then decided to respond with vitriol. That’s exactly the kind of attitude that is so prolific on Reddit, and I am happy to leave it behind. Thank you for your reasoned reply.

OP, I encourage you in the future to choose grace.

[–] Ski@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

This kind of post right here is the gold standard for why I chose Kbin over other instances. Well reasoned, free of vitriol, and looking to build a new culture outside of the one a lot of us left behind on Reddit.

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vitriol is a strong word to describe what I said about Beehaw. I do not hold a bitter spite to what Beehaw did, in fact I understand and accept their decision as prudent and appropriate for their community.

I simply hate how they act benevolent where the reality is the opposite; that their admins are legitimately overlords akin to a full-time power-abusing reddit moderator.

Regarding your comment that I need to act with more grace, my apologies. You are correct, I should be less aggressive in my opinions and will self-censor henceforth to protect and maintain the humility of the discussions that occur here.

[–] SemioticStandard@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I simply hate how they act benevolent where the reality is the opposite; that their admins are legitimately overlords akin to a full-time power-abusing reddit moderator.

What do you mean by this? Do you have examples? Maybe you’re correct and I just haven’t seen it, but every example I’ve seen of them responding to something has been great.

Regarding your comment that I need to act with more grace, my apologies. You are correct, I should be less aggressive in my opinions and will self-censor henceforth to protect and maintain the humility of the discussions that occur here.

Don’t sweat it, brother. <3

[–] eta_aquarid@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

yeah, this is the weird thing; Beehaw's reasonings are incredibly reasonable, and they're not saying that the other parts of Lemmy aren't good enough for them, which is what I think a lot of people are getting mad at

that and thinking that they're entitled to access to Beehaw

[–] Noki@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

100% - the beauty of the fedivers is that everybody can chose to federatre OR NOT!

If people wanne follow beehaw they can switch server or even go to some other fedivers project and follow from there.

[–] eta_aquarid@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't the whole point of the fediverse that you get to create and craft your experience for your community? There's a really good reason defederating is a feature. I don't get it, Beehaw decides to use the features of federation so now we: firstly become tribalistic (them vs us), and secondly decide to get angry? Like it or not, this is what you signed up for when you wanted federation.

Yes, exactly

like we're not owed Beehaw's cooperation; it's their instance and if the users want to do this then that's their perogative

Regardless, this is being blown out of proportion; Beehaw outright said that this was temporary

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah I don't feel quite as harshly but as soon as I saw they didn't allow downvotes I knew their philosophy wasn't for me. Too bad about losing their gaming group though.

[–] Zebov@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

After reading that post, I'm actually pretty glad they're leaving.

[–] Captain_Wtv@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'll be honest, it's weird to not allow downvotes but be on a federated site. Idk if I'm weird or if that's just me tho. Like if you go to beehaw from another Lemmy instance you can downvote them.

[–] Noki@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

most of the fedivers has no downvote - please be respectfulll of the diferences.

[–] Arnl@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I think you may downvote it but it won't be visible on their side.

[–] DigiWolf@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's been my view too. There's definitely a need for moderation, but I've been on the internet for quite some time and the vibe from Beehaw is very much concerning. Any time I've seen a community run like that, it always always ends up feeling like an echochamber run by a dictator. I want an internet that's mostly wholesome, not a "happy fun camp where there's all smiles and you had better not frown!"

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are now banned from beehaw.org

[–] EnglishMobster@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I wonder if there's a Pyongyang community.

...Come to think of it, Lemmygrad probably has one. But I'm not going over there to look.

[–] lamentforicarus@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I have a beehaw account. I've only experienced one user who's a bit too intense about their thoughts. Everyone else has just been chill. The admin aren't defederating from lemmy.ml, the other big instance, and have no plans to do so. They really were just overwhelmed by the two feds they blocked because of trollish users. It's not as intense as you make it sound.

[–] geoffervescent@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's great. I want an account there for the occassions when I want to visit a safe space or a SFW website. It doesnt have to be your identity. You can go to different instances in different contexts, for different modes of interaction. And a third unrelated instance can remain federated with them both, if that's amenable to all parties.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

And like all echo chambers, it will inevitably collapse