this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
544 points (95.9% liked)

politics

18931 readers
3269 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The shooter was 12 when Trump was first elected. archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Poor bastard. At 20, mental capacity is nowhere near its peak, and how bad must your life be if you are willing to throw it away for some obese self-tanning cream using orange dipshit? This is what happens when mental illnesses aren't taken serious, and treatment is not easily available.

[–] ValorieAF@lemmy.world 91 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, let's see

Looks at everything on fire around us

Yeah I have no clue what could have caused his life to be bad enough to do something like that!

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think you misunderstood. I wasn't saying I don't see how people could have mental problems in this world. That was a rhetorical question, observing that the poor bastard was obviously very broken / brainwashed / ill / whatever.

[–] PepperoniNipple@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

How the hell was he brainwashed for shooting an asshole who is promoting hate crimes towards minorities? You have to be a MAGA to say dumb shit like this

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right…the problem is the very troubled young man, not the fact that he had easy access to firearms.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

How is my statement in any way negating that point?

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 71 points 2 months ago

You've managed to identify the highly effective, yet morally reprehensible strategy for military recruitment. Get young men when they are at peak testosterone, but have limited pre-frontal cortex development.

[–] PepperoniNipple@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Don't speak about patriotic heroes like that.

Do you call everyone who fought in 4th of july a bastard and mental too? Your ancestors who gave you the freedom you have right now? He did what most of us don't have the balls to do. That is not sickness, it's bravery.

People should really drop the whole "violence scawy" bullshit already, this is why a lot of innocent people are dying in really dumb ways nowadays, like for being gay or being black and nothing else

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

They were launching Roman candles at each other. It was a whole thing.

[–] PepperoniNipple@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes dude, the peak and culmination of your Revolutionary War that ended with thousands of american lives lost just so that you could disrespect them like you are right now

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Ok, just checking that it was indeed you not having any idea what you are talking about. The 4th was neither a peak of the war or a culmination of said war. Also, your phrasing of "...who fought in the 4th of July" is just ridiculous and not how anyone would say that. You would say "...who fought in the Revolutionary War". Your point would still be absurd and wrong, but it would at least sound like a human wrote it.

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I love you, Salami Navy. Chef's kiss. 😘

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

He doesn't have to be exploited by his boss or landed lord anymore.

Peace someday. Hope yall find yours in this life not the next.