this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
241 points (91.4% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 82 points 4 months ago (1 children)

did the attenders draw their guns and stop the assasin?

[–] Famko@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

More likely someone fired at him in celebration in those rallies.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

just saw the news at it was kinda wierd. did not seem like anyone behind him got hit and he was hit in the ear and pumped his fist after ward. They said metal detectors are used so sounds like a sniper type thing. I sorta think they likely would figure out the origin. I wonder if they have him or are after them but don't want to update yet.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

It seems odd that a bullet might have grazed his ear yet not shot anyone or anything behind him. Also, the picture of his bloodied ear and the splatter make it look like the shot came from behind him.

[–] Mzpip@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

Apparently one person is dead, another injured. Also, the shooter has been killed by the Secret Service. (According to CBC news).

[–] wagesj45@kbin.run 7 points 4 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if those people sitting behind him are deceptively far away.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Also if it's a sniper whyd he put his head up again?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Alert went out that the shooter was down. SS kept him down until then.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

ok so they did get the shooter. Did they way if it was in front or behind?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No word on that yet, just that the shooter is confirmed dead + one other attendee, and a 2nd attendee is severely injured.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 4 months ago

I was wondering as I heard injuries. Seems at this point it came from trumps right.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Especially at the angle he was standing. Either an amazing accident, or something suspicious. Still not sure if this wasn't staged. The whole thing seems weird as hell.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Did you see the cherry picker gush fluid and fall. I think a hydraulic line popped hit someone and police started shooting in that general direction as is usual.