politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Right right so DEI just means "anyone not white, male and cishet".
I've never seen cishet written before and I'm here trying to pronounce it... Maybe it's pronounced "cishay" like French? I figured it out in the end.
cis-het
and "cis" is pronounced with a soft c, so "sis", not "kis"
Pretty sure it's sashay because it's French and it drives people nuts on multiple levels /s
As long as DEI, Affirmative Action, positive discrimination, w/e state encouraged discrimination is called nowadays exists, people will always question whether someone is there on merit or if they're here to fill a quota.
I thing you meant to say "Bigots will use it as an excuse to question."
Sure, whatever.
Even if you're right, are they not also right?
Bigots will use it, sure. Other people too.
Simply put DEI is racism and nothing good ever comes out of racism. It's a piss poor solution. A band aid on a cancer tumor.
Equality begins at birth. Education, healthcare, welfare, etc. should all be free and available to everyone. This is how you beat discrimination.
When you're a diversity hire, your talents and work will always be scrutinized harder than anyone else's. Are you here because of your skills, or because you have the proper skin color and gender to fill the quota? It's a struggle you will always deal with whether you like it or not.
You should have probably lead with that. You got downvoted because you sounded like another right-wing dei basher imo.
I don't care about down votes, I just spoke the truth and people can't handle it.
I think provisional measures ("bandaid" solutions) should always come with an "until ____ is passed". Because yes, it shouldn't be how we have to do things. But while there isn't the political will to do/get the thing that would actually help the situation, something needs to be done to mitigate the harm that already exists. For example, I don't want to have to drink water from a dirty stream. That shouldn't be the standard. But if I find myself in a situation where it's that or to die of dehydration... restricting/denying the Band-Aid is essentially condemning them to the original harm
The problem with band aid solutions is that the actual necessary measures never happen because "well we put a band aid on it so it's ok."