Ukraine

8212 readers

687 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lisko@sopuli.xyz

doo@sh.itjust.works

Burstar@sopuli.xyz

153

Russia lacks troops, ammunition for major offensive in Ukraine, NATO official tells Reuters (kyivindependent.com)

submitted 4 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's only partly true. Its half of what America wants, but you completely ignore that there are other actors and factors in the situation.

No matter how much weapons Ukraine gets, it's still better for them to get a few than none.

[–] SirDerpy@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That's only partly true. Its half of what America wants, but you completely ignore that there are other actors and factors in the situation.

If I provide a synopsis you'll simply expand the scope once again. Good faith would've been listing those factors and why they're important.

No matter how much weapons Ukraine gets, it's still better for them to get a few than none.

I provided reason for my position. You've a thesis statement.

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I hoped I don't need to list other actors and factors as they are pretty obvious.

You provided reason? Lol. What are you, a comic book character? Relax. You wrote down a classic America-centric far leftist opinion that has been around for 30+ years. Nothing worth repeating.