this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
509 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59679 readers
4652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Me, with a 200 Terrabyte usb drive, wondering why this is an issue.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

A 200TB USB drive doesn't exist. What are you talking about?

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 10 points 4 months ago

Not going to put words in OP's mouth, and it's entirely possible they're either exaggerating, talking about a RAID array, or richer than God,

but the only place I know of to buy flash drives that big is Wish.com

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago
[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I use BD-R for archival storage of important files. They're cheaper and easier than tape as well as small. I burn them in triplicate and throw them in the same case and as long as the same 3 bits don't corrupt I can recover. The shelf life on a blue ray sealed and stored well is a few decades which is better than most other media.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Where are you buying your Blu-rays? Every time I've looked into burnable BD-Rs they've been more expensive per gigabyte than a 3.5" SATA hard drive (which has the bonus of better data longevity and being rewritable).

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I understand that from a business perspective, but I'm having a hard time rationalizing it for personal use.

I guess, if you're doing a lot of video editing and you want to preserve a large personal library? Idk.

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

It's mostly family photos and videos. I've become the de facto family digital archivist. Some digital copies of important phyiscal records. When you convert files to lossless/uncompressed formats suitable for long term storage they get large really quickly.

[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How often do you lend your drives to your friends? A cheap way to send big files without internet connection was paramount for sharing information.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Very rarely. I tend to have shared text or Excel files to actively share and work on. Nothing in the hundreds of gigs.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Flash-style drives like SSDs and... drives from alliexpress aren't recommended for long-term storage.