this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
129 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9682 readers
1754 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In no way did my brain consider this to not be satire...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Ahhh, so it's not actually the bike lane causing problems - it's the backed-up traffic, and they want to expand to use the lane again during rush hour.

Missing, of course, that even if they use that lane for cars, soon enough even that lane will be backed up as well. Missing, of course, that cyclists and pedestrians also want to use the lane during commuting hours. And, that the other potential solution is to encourage people to use other ways of commuting, like by trains and buses. OR, to enforce automative standards that have engines shut down when they're stopped for more than a few seconds, then autostart the engine when resuming - as European cars often do.

But no, let's kick cyclists out to expand the waiting-in-place-mobile.

[–] Xeelee@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The solution is obviously to add more car lanes. We all know that works, right?

[–] Baketime@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Missing, of course, that even if they use that lane for cars, soon enough even that lane will be backed up as well

All those cyclists would now have to drive. Wonder how much congestion that would add

[–] Michaelmitchell@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No one does cycle to commute there though, the bridge itself is 4 miles and then there's another couple miles of hills and suburbs before you get to where you want to go. Very few people are willing to do a 8+ mile commute on bike every morning. That doesn't mean that lane should just be another car lane though, imo they should keep the barriers up and make it a bus only lane during the morning. Everybody wins, the bicyclists can just strap there bike to the front of the bus and only have to ride the last mile, people who can't ride a bike but want a faster commute out of traffic can take the bus, the cars can sit in their soul crushing traffic and watch a bus whiz by and realize the error of their ways.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Missing, of course, that cyclists and pedestrians also want to use the lane during commuting hours.

Well I mean part of the frustration is that no, during commute hours no one is actually using the bike lane.