this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
197 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

7193 readers
359 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive: [ https://archive.is/sEZIL ]

Coal accounted for 80 per cent of Alberta’s electricity grid in the early 2000s and it still amounted to 60 per cent just 10 years ago. When phasing out coal was just an idea being batted around, many said it couldn’t be done. This is not dissimilar to the rhetoric today around decarbonizing the grid. But Alberta’s experience phasing out coal shows environmental progress of this magnitude is possible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Great headline but doesn't indicate what replaced it.

Carbon dioxide still getting produced in massive quantities.

Coal and other hydrocarbons still being produced for export. But, hey, if it gets burned in another jurisdiction that isn't our problem, right? We will put up those glass barriers all the way to space so our atmospheres don't mix.

Southern Alberta is probably the best place in Canada for massive scale solar installations. Get on it.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Southern Alberta is probably the best place in Canada for massive scale solar installations. Get on it.

Alberta declared solar panels "ugly" so they wont be installing them anymore.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Alberta said that putting it on prime agricultural land needed some restrictions, and rightly so. The amount of good farmland that's under solar panels now in south and central is disconcerting. There's no end of shit land in Alberta that's better suited to solar panels anyway.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

It goes to show how little they actually care about capitalism. If farmland is more productive (makes more money) producing solar, then capitalism would say turn it into solar.

They're literally stealing money from the farmers.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

https://renewablesassociation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/EN-2023-Map.png

Alberta produces 2-3X more energy per capita from wind and solar than any other province, and has almost as much renewable energy storage than the rest of Canada put together.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Thats awesome, but leaves out the fact that BC and Ontario do it by Hydro Electric dams, so solar and wind is less attractive

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Manitoba too! Net exporter of hydro.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Quebec does hydro. Ontario just calls it that, but majority comes from nuclear.

It probably wasn't that good for propaganda to call it "Nuclear One" when they've privatized the crown corporation.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Ha yeah, Ontario says it is only 1/3rd actual hydro power

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Well, I guess we all work with what we got, huh.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Battery storage, I presume. Many other provinces don't need the storage due to the ability to vary the output from dams.