this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
483 points (94.5% liked)

Privacy

31922 readers
936 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thayer@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

No, the average user will never know the difference. I couldn't tell you exactly what the current performance impact is for hardware encryption, but it's likely around 1-4% depending on the platform (I use LUKS under Linux).

For gamers, it's likely a 1-5 FPS loss, depending on your hardware, which is negligible in my experience. I play mostly first and third person shooter-style games at 1440p/120hz, targeting 60-90 FPS, and there's no noticeable impact (Ryzen 5600 / RX 6800XT).

[–] refalo@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For gamers, it’s likely a 1-5 FPS loss

I highly doubt it... would love to see some hard data on that. Most algorithms used for disk encryption these days are already faster than RAM, and most games are not reading gigabytes/sec from the disk every frame during gameplay for this to ever matter.

[–] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

If it has to go to disk for immediate loading of assets while playing a video game you're losing more than 1-5 fps

[–] refalo@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe, but not every frame while you're playing. No game is loading gigs of data every frame. That would be the only way most encryption algorithms would slow you down.

[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You're more likely going to get stuttering or asset streaming issues which are going to have more impact than losing a few fps.

[–] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah was thinking about that (edited to add immediate) -- games are certainly background loading nowadays but the stuff needed is intended to be in ram by the time it's needed, afaik.

[–] thayer@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I'm sure there are a lot of variables there. I can only say that in my experience, I noticed zero impact to gaming performance when I started encrypting everything about 10 years ago. No stuttering or noticeable frame loss. It was a seamless experience and brings real peace of mind knowing that our financial info, photos, and other sensitive files are safely locked away.

[–] ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

For sure I'm just saying i'd guess that's because at play time you're loading everything into ram. For bulk loading I would encryption perf follows the general use case.

(Tldr encryption shouldn't matter for games)