this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
717 points (95.2% liked)

People Twitter

5189 readers
2277 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Exactly. Similar to how others responded to a similar comment to yours, there isn't much slipstream savings without getting into the danger zone of around 30m (100ft), which you can't get with 3 second gaps at speed.

But you do get more fuel savings from driving at that slower speed, and from coasting and accelerating lightly/cruising. It perplexes me why people alternate gunning it with braking so much on the highway.

[–] Threeme2189@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

It perplexes me why people alternate gunning it with braking so much on the highway.

Because big fast car go brrrrrrr!

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

It perplexes me why people alternate gunning it with braking so much on the highway.

Allowing a molecule of space in front of you at any time makes everybody late!!1