this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
189 points (99.0% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

934 readers
548 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Just put up a drone delivery! it's so stupid they shouldn't be allowed to fly over living areas in general.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

FAA controls airspace from the blades of grass up. Airplanes are legally allowed to fly over private property, and drones are legally allowed to fly over private property. This is the current legal standing in America. I'm not saying it's right, but that's what it is.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't think thats right, otherwise you could sit in a drone and harass people on their property as long as you don't land there... That doesn't sound right. And i know its not legal in Germany, i hope its not actually like that in USA

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Harassing people violates local law, and reports of harassment and such are the only way local law enforcement can respond to drone issues since local law enforcement does not have the jurisdiction to enforce the federal statutes where the FAA regulates drones.

Drone law is crazy. There are lots of unintuitive things about it. It needs an overhaul.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok but what classifies as harassment? For me it would be seeing, hearing or feeling intrusive behavior by airborne objects in the airspace directly above my property.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What you describe is common. If you see a drone, you call your police and tell them you feel threatened or harassed. They will deal with it.

FYI all drones are required to broadcast a remote id that is registered to the drone device which is registered to a drone pilot. Your phone can receive that remote id signal, which you can give to law enforcement so they can find the pilot. Not having remote id on a drone is a felony, because once again, drones operate in federally controlled airspace.

https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 1 points 4 months ago

What you describe is common. If you see a drone, you call your police and tell them you feel threatened or harassed. They will deal with it.

if thats how it works, thats ok.

FYI all drones are required to broadcast a remote id that is registered to the drone device which is registered to a drone pilot. Your phone can receive that remote id signal, which you can give to law enforcement so they can find the pilot. Not having remote id on a drone is a felony, because once again, drones operate in federally controlled airspace.

https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id

Interesting

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is correct, you can even land there if you must and you're allowed to retrieve it. I've had to explain this to a farmer once while recovering a hot air balloon at gunpoint.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The emergency landing is one thing but just flying directly over private property (as in living areas and industrial complexes) is just crazy to me, agricultural areas are a different thing threre is nothing privat happening there and there are no possible industrial problems (security, safety...)

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There is so little unoccupied or public land in places where people want to live. It would be impossible if that was the rule.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I said agricultural areas are fine cause nothing is happening there, Forrest as well and yes thats basically how it is in Germany.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago

Forests don't need deliveries. And good luck flying planes anywhere over just forests.

There's a reason the FAA has the regulations it has.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

in this case, it wasn't. it was flying over the street.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

you think it was over someone's yard, fell from the sky, and crawled out, bleeding lithium ions all over the lawn before finally expiring in the street where it was found?