this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
1121 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

1449 readers
167 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kshade@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The way the ad is presented makes it look like there's something wrong with the original (❌) and that the mangled version is better (✅), as if it was actually improved.

The tool removed all the subtext from the original by using this very neutral, matter-of-fact language. There is actual information lost there, not just rigmarole. And that's the example they chose to put into the ad.

LLMs will also make shit up or completely misinterpret what's being written, I wouldn't trust it to get through an entire book without grossly misleading the reader or flipping out. They can't parse that much text at once right now so all interpretation of a chunk of text will have only a very broad, short and possibly wrong/irrelevant summary of what came before for context.

I don't even want to know what this would do to something like a Pratchett novel or a textbook.

As far as accessibility tools using machine learning go, wouldn't a text-to-speech reader app be better for dyslexics anyway?

[–] lambipapp@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I do not disagree with you. But i think it is up to the individual how they consume their media. And I agree with the pitfalls of LLMs, I just questioned all the super negative views of this that where upvoted when I entered this thread.

And when it comes to audio books and ai voice synthesis, they might be good tools, but does not necessarily achieve simplify the language. And also, i wish I was a better reader, not a better listener.

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

All fair points, my issue is mostly with how this is advertised and that I would not want to learn anything from an inherently untrustworthy LLM. Would have liked to use something with quick access to both human-made explanations and a built-in dictionary/thesaurus when I was learning English myself.