this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
1121 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

1449 readers
407 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

All right all right, I get why this is kind of funny and perhaps it's potentially a bad sign for humanity.

But consider an adult who's learning the English language and is still at a basic level. If they want reading practice, they are often stuck with kids books. This would make practice a lot more interesting.

[–] Deway@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There are "simplified" books for learners already.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So this is nothing to worry about, then!

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Except the simplified versions are made by humans who can preserve the flavor of the language and the important meanings, unlike this tool which is like replacing the Mona Lisa with text that says "woman sitting".

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

In English yes. But the less popular the language is, the less materials there are. With this you can take any book and simplify it to your level. Unlike mass-produced books, AI can be very flexible.

[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that popularity directly translates to the AIs ability to digest and paraphrase a book. LLMs have been trained on what is available in computer text format, which means mostly internet sources. English has an outsized presence on the internet compared the to actual number of native speakers, so there's magnitudes more training data for it than any other language. The models of other languages will be severely limited, if AI companies have spent the resources to train them at all.

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are many AI companies, including those that are based in countries where people communicate in other languages. What you are saying is not an insurmountable problem.

[–] ibt3321@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago

Yes it is insurmountable. There is not enough non-english text in the world to be able to train an LLM.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago

Now, 100% of books and all media is simplified and accessible to anybody who can get access to this tool

[–] probableprotogen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are SOME uses for this, but I still suspect its just going to fuel the already piss literacy levels in the United States. Albeit, for people learning English as a second language this is a legitimate use-case imo

[–] iopq@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People reading more might actually make them better readers, Even if it's too simple for your standards!

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure people are going to ask the AI "translate this text into a reading level that is just ahead of mine so I still improve"

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, the idea is good, I just don't trust AI to do a good job.

[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago

With the single example provided I’d say it did okay. Obviously in context that may change, but I don’t see this as much different from someone reading cliffs notes or something like blinkist.