this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
279 points (97.3% liked)

Privacy

4183 readers
16 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

No port forwarding, though. Some old guides still list them as having that capability, so I try to mention it frequently.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've never used that feature in any of my VPN clients before. What's the actual usecase for it?

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Possibly if one might want to be able to access a service behind the VPN without having a load balancer / reverse proxy?

[–] DannyMac@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's a turn off for some and I get why they did it

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't see why having options are turn-offs except maybe for those who provide said options.

[–] DannyMac@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand. I mean I see why not having port forwarding would turn someone off from going with Mullvad, but I understand Mullvad's rationale for doing so.

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I understand their decision to stop offering it, too, especially if I were in their position as a service provider. I still like the feature as a consumer.