this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13533 readers
930 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What does that have to do with this?

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Figured this was a good place to ask. Always found it was a bit weird the left rallied around him as much as it did. Critical support and all, but it always seemed to me a lot of what he was about got memory holed in the process.

[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 23 points 4 months ago

Assange has always been a dick, but he's also a point to rally around

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago

Self-preservation alone would be enough I'd argue.

It's a hideous and dangerous precedent even in a long and terrible history of dangerous precedents. And Assange was a relatively well connected, broadly (at the time, as far as most were concerned) apolitical figure. If the US had been able to walk through what they wanted, with little to no concern or push back from other states and legal groups, I'm certain they'd already be black bagging and trying left wing journalists and whistleblowers of much lower profiles in secret military courts.

I don't think this plea deal or any amount of public outcry is going to stop the likes of the CIA pulling that kind of thing if they really want or need to enough. But it does make it harder. It does indicate there's stakes for governments who go along with it. It does add a cost to that kind of activity. And it may have helped stop it becoming policy more broadly used.