this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
841 points (93.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5863 readers
3290 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is and it isn’t. If NASA sent up rockets like them, blew them up, and said “that’s what we wanted to happen!”, at the same tax dollar spent ratio, there would be congressional hearings and massive outrage.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

When you build new things they necessarily blow up during the development process. NASA is hobbled by a flat budget so they can't afford to blow anything up. So they can't build anything new, which is why SLS is a bunch of old parts scrapped together.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

SLS is a bunch of old parts scrapped together.

True. But those old parts scrapped together is what makes SLS beautiful. :P