UK Politics

3100 readers

304 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom

GreatAlbatross

flamingos

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

117

BBC Question Time: analysis of guests over nine years suggests an overuse of rightwing voices (theconversation.com)

submitted 5 months ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/uk_politics

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It seems like all of the data is in the article to me. There are searchable tables on all of the criteria and the information comes from the publicly accessible TV show that is being studied. I'm sure if you trawled through every episode and charted the guests yourself, it would be easy to point out anything false.

It looks like the study is still ongoing and has not been "published" in that it has not been written up and peer reviewed, but this is an article about the raw data collected and drawing some conclusions from that alone.

Even if it were peer reviewed and published in a journal, the peers would not go through and verify the data before publication.

[–] mannycalavera 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that's all fine and good. I just thought it was odd that they don't mention this. I'm not sure why they didn't. But I only spent a few minutes looking at the article, it was just something that crossed my mind. Usually this a big red flag when talking about and presenting data, that's all.

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

There are articles about studies, and there are articles of investigative reporting. This is the latter.