this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
218 points (97.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40040 readers
865 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is there any benefit to host my own instance?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leopardboy@netmonkey.tech 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's awesome! Running my own social media instances has become a hobby for me.

Having my own Lemmy instance has felt fairly seamless versus using Lemmy.world, but there have been some kinks. For example, when attempting to subscribe to a new community, the server has to pull a bunch of data first. This takes several seconds, but the UI simply says "not found" -- and then after several seconds, the UI updates with the community you want to follow. I figured this out by tailing the logs.

Also, the installation was pretty damn easy, especially when compared to Mastodon.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'd maybe be interested in trying out self-hosting Mastodon at some point too, good to hear that Lemmy was easy to install though. I'm not too worried since I have quite a bit of Linux experience, I figure it probably won't be too bad to setup whatever social media instances I'm interested in checking out.

[–] leopardboy@netmonkey.tech 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, if you've got a decent amount of Linux experience, I don't think you'll have any issues. Mastodon's installation is well-documented and works. My only criticism is that it's a bit long and you have to be careful not to miss anything.

On the other hand, I recall installing Pixelfed back several months ago and having a difficult time. The documentation was lacking, and it required me to use Arch Linux, which I had never used. I was able to get it working, but eventually terminated the instance after a while because I was never using it.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oof, yeah, requiring someone to use Arch definitely seems like a steep requirement lol

[–] leopardboy@netmonkey.tech 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LOL

It wasn't bad -- I just wasn't familiar with it.

[–] azura@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait. I'm looking at the Pixelfed installation guide right now and it doesn't tell me to use Arch at all? Isn't it just a PHP app?

[–] leopardboy@netmonkey.tech 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's awesome. This was several months ago when there was a link to some specific Arch Linux documentation that @dansup@mastodon.social mentioned was the most complete. Sounds like it's been cleaned up.

Yeah, I think it is a PHP app.

[–] azura@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

mm. Might have been a getting started from the ground up kind of setup guide and the author might be most familiar with that. But happily it seems like there's docker files in the main repo, including docker compose files, so that should make it quite easy to set up.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea, but then they can say "I use arch btw". That's what really matters in life.