this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
-49 points (25.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

29643 readers
1023 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hear me out. There's nothing innate to an object that makes it "food". It's an attribute we give to certain things that meet certain qualities, i.e. being digestible, nutritious, perhaps tasty or satisfying in some way, etc. We could really ingest just about anything, but we call the stuff that's edible "food". Does that make it a social construct?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This is one of those gender vs sex dealies.

Food is not a social construct. But meals are.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

ruh roh what if sex is also a social construct

nah not going down that rabbit hole

(wonder why we chose to group biological factors XYZ to determine those classes instead of classes based on ABC tho...)

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

sex is also a social construct

Can we also at least stick our head down that rabbit hole? Because holy shit yes that nebulous hybrid of social convention and biological (on a species level) necessity is also where food fits.....

(I am referring of course to sex the act, not the synonym for gender...)

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I was actually speaking about the biological classification "sex", not the act! I hadn't thought about the act as a social construct, but I guess it obviously is. I'm reminded of the old lesbian conundrum: "Was what we just did 'sex' or...?"