Feddit UK

3,498 readers
115 users here now

Who are we?

Feddit.uk is UK-centric, with integration to the wider Fediverse.
We tend to focus on UK-interest communities, others are welcome.

The name is a shortening of "federate it".
Want to share a thing? Share it with the fediverse, or, fed-it.

What are the rules here?

Rules apply on this instance, and when using an account from this instance to interact with other instances.
Administrators may warn or ban for breaches of the rules, or the spirit of the rules.

Where should I start?

Here

Elsewhere

Frontends

Donation Link

This site does not serve adverts.
OpenCollective donate button
OpenCollective donor counter link

Contact

Matrix

Uptime status

Fediseer

Fediseer guarantees

Fediseer endorsements

Threads

Meta's activitypub network has been blocked as a default.
If you believe there is a good case for this not to be, please start a thread in the feddit.uk community.

Banner

Credit for the iconic banner --> https://joelgoodman.net

founded 1 year ago
ADMINS
1
 
 

... Big Brother Watch slammed the new powers. Director Silkie Carlo said: "Starmer's benefits bank spying proposals sound alarmingly similar to the powers Labour fought just a few months ago in opposition. Everyone wants fraud to be dealt with, and the government already has strong powers to investigate the bank statements of suspects.

"But to force banks to constantly spy on benefits recipients without suspicion means that not only millions of disabled people, pensioners, and carers will be actively spied on but the whole population's bank accounts are likely to be monitored for no good reason."

Carlo said a "financial snoopers' charter" designed to automate suspicion of the UK's poorest people was intrusive, unjustified, and risks the kind of injustice seen during the Post Office Horizon scandal.

"This is yet another insult to pensioners, an attack on Britain's poorest people, and an assault on the presumption of innocence," she said.

2
 
 

... Big Brother Watch slammed the new powers. Director Silkie Carlo said: "Starmer's benefits bank spying proposals sound alarmingly similar to the powers Labour fought just a few months ago in opposition. Everyone wants fraud to be dealt with, and the government already has strong powers to investigate the bank statements of suspects.

"But to force banks to constantly spy on benefits recipients without suspicion means that not only millions of disabled people, pensioners, and carers will be actively spied on but the whole population's bank accounts are likely to be monitored for no good reason."

Carlo said a "financial snoopers' charter" designed to automate suspicion of the UK's poorest people was intrusive, unjustified, and risks the kind of injustice seen during the Post Office Horizon scandal.

"This is yet another insult to pensioners, an attack on Britain's poorest people, and an assault on the presumption of innocence," she said.

view more: next ›