100%. If they think life starts at conception then the pill, IUDs, and plan B are out. Then we'll see the mental gymnastics over condoms.
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
395 points (99.0% liked)
politics
19088 readers
3737 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
They’ll never ban condoms. This is all about controlling women, not sex.
The religious right thinks premarital sex is a sin. And they are all about imposing their views on others.
The religious right thinks YOUR premarital sex is a sin. They are totally fine with THEIR premarital/adulterous/rape sex.
A common misconception is that conservative/religious men in the lower ecclons aren't similarly oppressed.
The truth is that sweeping populations of men are controlled by the higher ups in those groups.
It's the leaders controlling "the rabble", not all the men controlling all the women.
If a peasant feels superior to his wife, he'll kick her when the master kicks him. Having women at the bottom of the pile makes it easier for the elite to maintain power.
If a peasant feels superior to his wife, he'll kick her when the master kicks him.
When the woman is made to "be lesser" and the man is made to go to the church, the man is broken down all day, and he goes home to his wife who he proceeds to break down.
When "the master" kicks him, he kicks her.
I'm not saying to not stand up for the oppressed women. I'm saying encourage the women to see it and escape it.
I'm also saying 50 men tops in these circles are "higher up", and 5 of them are "top", and the other 50,000 abused and oppressed men also need to see it and escape.
It's both. Hashtag notallmen
yesshortmen
Love it.
Can you explain how the pill and IUD are out?
The combined oral contraceptive pill suppresses ovulation, there's nothing to conceive with.
Copper IUDs denature the head of the sperm, meaning they are no longer able to fertilise an egg.
In both instances, there's either a no egg, or no viable sperm. It's no different to having sex while infertile (is that a crime too? Because if it is I'd like to see them try and stop me)
I can see how the pill could end up on the chopping block, as it's secondary method of action is to prevent the uterine lining thickening enough to support implantation of a fertilised egg, but copper IUDs prevent contraception, so life never begins, and thus nothing is "murdered"
Oh the answer is quite simple they will be "out" because they enable godless whores to have sex outside of marriage without consequences. And by consequences we mean forced conception and birth and with any luck the mutilation and/or death of the woman if anything goes wrong.
As Jesus intended. Next question.
Ah thank you, I was using too much logic and failed to remember that misogynistic laws aren't made from a position of reason.
Right, this is the logical way to look at it.
Too bad these forced birth fanatics don't give a shit about logic.
It's simply about control and punishment.
There. Right there. That's your campaign rally call.
"Contraception is next."
It sucks but fear will get everyone to the polls better than anything else. Please stop nursery rhymes and name calling bs.
“would you force your daughter to deliver her rapist’s baby, or else go to prison for murder”
These headlines keep saying fears as if it wasn't said outright bye Alito and his friends. Threats. That's the word they're looking for. Threats that contraception could be next.
threats against the citizens. a handful of people that can be counted on one hand are willing and eager to cause the suffering of millions. the answer seems obvious to me.
From the party that brought us the hit "don't take our guns", comes their next single, "we're coming for your condoms."
Where in the constitution does it say:
…the right of the people to keep and wear Condoms, shall not be infringed.
Hmm?
/s
If I (with consent) spray cum all over my wife, have I angered ~~god~~ the government with my seed? If so, who do I visit to obtain a permit for bukkake? Do each of us have to get a permit or can I put it under an llc? I don’t want to have to scoop it off and into her.
Unfortunately our government is far behind on bukkake law.
Oddly relevant username
Now you got me thinking anal sex with a woman might be the only legal act.
it's the loophole.
Not enough information provided. Please share video or photos with us so this community can give proper feedback.
Ahh, so this is how they're going to fix the declining birth rate.
God forbid we just let immigrants in, they’ll steal our jobs. We need to make more Americans (white people) to take those jobs
To be fair, I am humbled because while I know IVF has been banned in a misguided attempt to ban abortions, I am team stop breeding, so I have enjoyed that self inflicted gunshot wound on the right.
Makes me see how I'm opposite aligned on the topic, not just disagreeing with their point.
Do you know the reason behind separation of church and state? Freedom from religion.