!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
I searched through Lemmy posts with that word. Half of them have people asking the exact same question, and based on the answers, I'm going to conclude that no one knows.
One guess that seems plausible is that it's an AI hallucinated word that's showing up a lot because they're using AI to generate the captions.
Next step is for people to also start using it and we'll experience the beginning of AI generated slang
That's plausible. Araffe comment, thanks.
How dare you talk about my mother araffe
Ive asked the same question, the conclusion that I came to is it is a foreign word that doesnt mean anything in the context and is a give away to AI generated images.
and is a give away to AI generated images
Username: MyPornViewingAccount
Everything checks out.
Googling the word with quotes brings up a Lemmy thread first, I thought that was interesting.
Is this question specific to Lemmy somehow? I haven't heard of the term before this thread either
We, ve made it Lemmy ! We created a Word and brought it to Google front page
I think it's this. I looked into it recently and there was a paper on AI and they noted "araffe" coming up as a caption when it was AI generated. They didn't have an explanation, said it was something to look into.
This is the very definition of Model Collapse.
It seems to me to be a word that image description generators (and potentially image generators, too) "believe" to exist. If that's correct that was likely caused by parsing chunks of actual words, such as "arabesque", "Arabic", "coffee", "giraffe", as if ara+ffe were two actual morphemes (units of meaning).
For reference, this site claims that [I think?]diffusion models think that a similar word, "arafed", exists; and that's basically going slow, taking one's time, leisurely.
It isn't necessarily NSFW by the way.
Araf is also slow in Welsh.
I mentioned in another comment chain, but: even if we claim that "araffe" is ultimately from Welsh "araf", we're still left with the double consonant and the ending -e to explain - those don't even appear in the conjugation of "arafu".
I'm pretty sure it's a synonym of covfefe.
There's some AI model that used it. Its meaning is related to "relaxed and lounging around". I think it appears in automated posts. BLIP can interrogate an image and produce a text description. I suspect that's what happening.
Maybe it's a misspelling? "Giraffe Women". Yo! Nice neck!!
I was thinking Arab but I like your idea better
New fetish unlocked.
I think, based on responses indicating AI influence, that this is a a worthwhile filter/exclude keyword. I have only encountered the word while viewing /all and it is normally in the /garterbelt forum. Perhaps there is a bot a play?
It's the new "lingers"
What's the old lingers?
Whatever/whoever posts these captions used to often use the word "lingers" to describe lingerie. Ex: "Women in lingers on a bed."
One day, some guy responded to a post and said he couldn't take it anymore and to stop saying it. It actually stopped. Hasn't used that word since as far as I've seen.
Echoing what others have said that it so far appears to be hallucinated/AI-coined from everything I've seen so far, as well as that I've seen a variant spelled "Arafed."
Araff is highest in Arabic. A misspelling perhaps?
Maybe slow like in Welsh.
This sounds like it might be something similar to a 'noken', or maybe just a regular token which represents a word fragment, a concept I picked up from this article. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/c6uTNm5erRrmyJvvD/mapping-the-semantic-void-strange-goings-on-in-gpt-embedding
"TL;DR: GPT-J token embeddings inhabit a zone in their 4096-dimensional embedding space formed by the intersection of two hyperspherical shells. This is described, and then the remaining expanse of the embedding space is explored by using simple prompts to elicit definitions for non-token custom embedding vectors (so-called "nokens"). The embedding space is found to naturally stratify into hyperspherical shells around the mean token embedding (centroid), with noken definitions depending on distance-from-centroid and at various distance ranges involving a relatively small number of seemingly arbitrary topics (holes, small flat yellowish-white things, people who aren't Jews or members of the British royal family, ...) in a way which suggests a crude, and rather bizarre, ontology. Evidence that this phenomenon extends to GPT-3 embedding space is presented. No explanation for it is provided, instead suggestions are invited."
In particular I was reminded of the list of tokens near the beginning of the article, and how it contains not just words, but also fragments of words, prefixes, and things like that. I'm also reminded of another article (which I can't find right now) about people finding ways to bypass word filters by utilizing nonsense words that the LLM has mistakenly associate with some meaning. From what others have said in this thread, 'araffe' sounds like it might be something like that
Found the other paper I was thinking of: 'Discovering the Hidden Vocabulary of DALLE-2' https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00169
Someone offered a definition here: https://lemmy.world/comment/8529913
From the discussion, that definition may also be a hallucination, though.