this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
677 points (91.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35903 readers
1479 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn't have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

You act as if logic and consistency matters to them

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think cosmetic surgery should be limited to adults, yes. Circumcision here is usually cosmetic (someone wants the baby to look like the Dad, I am not kidding, that is the argument I hear the most) so like labiaplasty, I don't think it should be done to people who can't choose it. I don't think intersex babies should be modified either.

Trans care for minors does not involve surgery. But other gender affirming care should be available to those over 13, like sexual health services are, without parental consent. That's the age we legally think kids get some privacy rights so why not this?

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Cosmetic surgery encompasses a lot more things than boob jobs. A burn victim getting skin replacement is cosmetic surgery for example.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The same answer to both:

Religious indoctrination.

[–] Poik@pawb.social 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

In America, it appears to have started being in vogue during WWII as a way for single moms whose husband is overseas to have less to take care of. After a bit of coercion, my parents admitted the hospital did it without even their consent. That does sound a lot like [insert birth state here] in the [insert birth decade here] so I didn't question it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] doingless@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There's actually no mandate for non-Jewish people people to be circumcised in Christianity. It's specifically made clear that it isn't a requirement for "gentiles" in the new testament. But I have a great circumcised cock and I have no complaints. I'm still curious what it would be like naturally though.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I have a great circumcised cock

oh yeah?

#prove it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

In my country circumcision is only for medical reasons

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Assuming you’re talking about male circumscission, the short answer is you’re about to be inundated with accusations of antisemitism.

As for female circumcision; it is illegal in the US. The Stop FGM act was signed into federal law in 2020.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would have loved to have the option to keep my hoodie on or not. I have a wicked crooked scar down there too. It doesn't keep me up at night but if I was given the choice I would have said no.

[–] fishbone@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

(at the risk of making a truly stupid joke)

You could wear some pants instead of trying to cover it with just a hoodie.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist 12 points 9 months ago

Because it's "traditional".

Prepare for all sorts of excuses that appear to be along the lines of "Americans don't know how to wash their cocks".

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 10 points 9 months ago

The first problem is using logic. These bans are to hurt trans people to score political points. Nothing more.

Proving they are logically unsound does nothing for the base that eats this up. They just want to hurt those that scare and confuse them, that's all.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Banning medical procedures is never a good idea. Circumcision can be a necessary measure to improve someone's genital health. Banning circumcision could also result in legal troubles for other surgeries where a scalpel needs to be brought into proximity of a penis.

Compare this, for example, to cases where bans on abortion resulted in doctors unable to carry out obviously necessary steps: https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/16/health/abortion-texas-sepsis/index.html

What could be banned, though, is mutilation of a minor, i.e. no consent and no recommendation for this procedure from a doctor.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Studies have shown that circumcision is typically not necessary. There are definitely extreme cases where the procedure may be required but the cleanliness aspect or for sti protection is make belief.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] waitmarks@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

We are talking about the non consensual circumcision of infants. Of course if an adult wants one done, they should be allowed to go do it, or if it is actually deemed medically necessary. 99% of these circumcisions are not though in the US. That's what needs to be banned.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zorque@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago

Same reason they want to ban trans medical procedures. "Family values"

It's tradition, so supporting it means supporting the status quo. Change is scary, and throwing shade at the past means throwing shade at all the people who've been harmful things all their lives. Can't have that, then they'd be to blame for not doing better (even though most probably didn't know better nor had good resources to know better).

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Why are you allowed Viagra, minoxidil, testosterone supplements, lifts in your shoes, girdles, hair plugs, tanning booths, calf implants, guns, camo/armor, ozempic and all the other gender affirming care that many conservatives and theocratic nutjobs enjoy to help pretend they're big, strong men and not the withering impotent cowards that they actually are?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›