this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
1174 points (89.3% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19603 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Trans Europe Express

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would they win in a contest that has female beauty parameters tho? It's like judging an M based on how similar it looks to an F

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Crampon@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Ok sure. But it's not really an effective protest as they're fulfilling the requirement to enter the competition. Because the competition is steered by judges they will simply eliminate the trans men in the first round.

The rule is there to make sure the judges are not sexually aroused when they see a trans woman.

A greater means of protest would be if the non-trans competitors all quit the pageant. But their look is their only talent, so they won't.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›