this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
685 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19150 readers
2823 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 190 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Now if they could just take this lesson and apply it to the rest of the 'information' that is supplied by the media environment they have immersed themselves in.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 123 points 10 months ago (1 children)

These people are going to go home and be proud of how they defended the border and tell everyone about it.

"Immigrants stopped coming because we were there! See?! It works!"

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Lisa, I want to buy your rock."

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't there some scammer that was selling pieces of the border wall? Like you could sponsor a piece of it and have your name on it?

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

personalized vanity stones with family names and little messages being used to stop families at the border is actually hilarious

"From the Johnsons. Peter, Debbie, and little David. - we're hate-filled!"

or one with their pets pawprint "my Pepper is just as racist as I am!"

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

"Thoughts and prayers -- for your death."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 102 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The last time they tried a Civil war they failed, and destroyed their own economies in the process. That time, they had some of the best generals available. This time they have Boebert and Trump to lead them,

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago (10 children)

"Best generals available" might be a bit of a stretch. That's a bit of the Lost Cause mythology still wrattling about the internet.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Lee almost took it too, he didn't want to secede but he felt like he was betraying his fellow statesmen in Virginia. People forget that before the civil war people didn't think of themselves as Americans, they thought of themselves as citizens of whatever state they were from.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

On the contrary, I think your comment is a bit of a stretch in the other direction. Leaving variances in talent among individuals aside, the officers on both sides were broadly comparable because they had all gone through the same West Point training and were colleagues in the same chain of command, with the same strategy and doctrine, until the Southern ones turned traitor.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I assume ending this comment on a comma was intentional but even if it wasn't it's perfect

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 88 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Republicans are mentally defective.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Republicans are mentally deflective.

FTFY

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

¿Porque no los dos?

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 85 points 10 months ago (1 children)

MAGA convoy confused by red laser pointer

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm surprised any of them even made it to Texas, considering how hard they descended into paranoia and fear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 75 points 10 months ago (2 children)

confused Trumpanzee noises

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

Trumpanzee

Oh, hell yeah. I’m gonna do use this wherever I can now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 63 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Wait… wasn't there a huge invasion of South American immigrants about to hit our border in 2020? What ever happened to them? And what about the roving bands of Antifa attacking small towns?

These fucking idiots believe whatever the fuck is fed to them. They don't remember all the times that info was wrong and realign. That's why they're dangerous: they aren't operating on even the appearance of facts.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's like they didn't expect any of these losers to actually get off their asses and see for themselves that it's bullshit. Whoops.

Not that it matters for the rest of them. They're too far gone.

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 15 points 10 months ago

Ah yes, the infamous iMmIgRaNt CaRaVaN.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AlbinoPython@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Now have them try to land on an aircraft carrier. Just put a big ski jump at the edge of the dock. I am sure they will make it .

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

Let's tell them that there's a border invasion at the site of the Titanic wreckage

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

My first thought when I read the title was

Is this the onion?

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 33 points 10 months ago

Somehow I think they are confused about a lot of stuff.

[–] pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know what I expected. I can tell you it’s not as bad as what I thought.

Which is it you stupid?! How did civilization get this way? I can’t take it anymore.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How did civilization get this way?

Well, it started when Nixon posited that conservatives needed a republican news outlet to frame political problems in a way that always casted republicans in a good light, that way a media-landslide like Watergate wouldn't happen again. Fox News was born, and has slowly been pushing our society into what it is now.

So, to answer your question, the snowball started rolling about 50 years ago.

In the scenario in your comment, that very same news network told a bunch of gullable, trained idiots that we are being invaded, in order to make republican policy look good.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago (29 children)

The most connected period in human history also produces the dumbest humans, apparently.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

meanwhile, I ran into some moron from another country trying to tell me, an American, about how 26 US state governors have stood against the government and are "amassing troops at the texan border."

Fucking hilarious if it weren't so fucking sad and dangerous.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UtMan1988@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (6 children)
[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It's mostly an embedded clip from MSNBC; clicking the linked article can be informative!

I'm also not sure what bias you are accusing Meidas Touch of in the headline (since we know you didn't get any further than that)? Is it the part about the maga convoy being confused? We know they are easily led from one moral outrage to another without really understanding the issues.

The part about there not being an invasion at the border? It's obvious there isn't anything of the sort happening, because the people that are claiming it's happening are the same ones who just said that they refuse to do anything about it for a year, until (they hope) Trump is president.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think anyone associated with "maga" spend most of their lives in a state of confusion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

This amounts to an anecdote. This is the live national television equivalent of a tweet, and then someone wrote an article about the "tweet" this bumpkin made. There is no actual reporting done, no fact-checking (in before someone objects, "But wait! there were no facts to check!"), no following up with other sources. I doubt very much the "source" would agree with her characterization here. This is a nothingburger, and I have to agree with that guy getting spamdownvoted that this source is dogshit, while merrily disagreeing that MBFC is worth even half a turd.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 10 months ago

Fuckin biiiiiiiiiitches.

load more comments
view more: next ›