this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
350 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1961 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Rob Menendez says he's "had it" with the partisanship of Republicans on the Homeland Security Committee.

A Democratic lawmaker slammed his Republican colleagues over their fealty to Donald Trump on Tuesday night during a marathon 15-hour session on impeachment charges against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over border security issues.

Rep. Rob Menendez (D-N.J.) said the House Homeland Security Committee has held 17 hearings on the border, but zero full committee hearings on other issues within its jurisdiction such as emergency preparedness, cyber threats, infrastructure protection and more.

“We have not lived up to our oversight obligation here on this committee because you all are obsessed with the border,” he said. “Because you bend the knee to the ‘Orange Jesus’ as you refer to him across the aisle.”

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 84 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

Rips! At least he didn't "slam" them -

A Democratic lawmaker slammed his

Goddammit

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I made a post complaining about political articles using "slam" on Fark back in 2004. I wouldn't hold your breath that journalists will stop using it anytime soon.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Now I'm sad. Thanks a lot for slamming my dreams of better journalism.

[–] Encode1307@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Journalists generally don't write their headlines. It's usually copy editors from what I've heard.

[–] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

He sparked outrage by torching the GOP. You'll never believe what happened next

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Was ripped a new slam hole! Excoriated!

[–] Algaroth@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Don't mind if I do

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

A torch is never mentioned past the title. I'm disappointed every time.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The only politician I know of who actually slammed anyone was Greg Gianforte. I always feel compelled to throw that reminder out when this comes up.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Jesse The Body Ventura begs to differ.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Loud sigh. You definitely got me there.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's not Ventura.
That's all of mankind.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

In like 5-10 years lawmakers will be "roasting". I'd enjoy it if they all did actual roasts outside of the corespondents dinner.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I may have to learn how to make Lemmy bots so I can build a Slamometer. Increments a counter every time a headline says someone slammed something.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I think that's worth a try. If only to really get an idea of how much it's used by everyone.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Get some sabre rattling in there too

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

GOP Representative SLAMMED his dick in a drawer and blamed Democrats for his pain.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You know what's more boring than journalists recycling metaphors? The inevitable complaints people pay about it every. single. time.

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It's not about being boring. It's about calling out lazy journalism and this news trend of pretending like anything is changing while no progress actually happens.

This entire article is just saying they got mad and everyone still voted along party lines. That's a whole lot of nothing for such a sensationalist title.

I'm all for calling that out every single time.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, fuck people that point out professionals being lazy! Don't criticize anyone!

Want anything to be better? Well fuck you for wanting that. Amiright?

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Not like they care or are willing to do anything though.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago

bUt wHaT aBoUt CiViLiTy?

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Rapist Messiah